YOUR.SUNDAYMORNINGTV.COM: Recent Comments

Comment on Network TEN - Meet the Press - 8 Feb 09

network security firewall — Sat, 13 Mar 2010 05:42:52 GMT

Greatz....Lolx:D

Comment on Sky News - Sunday Agenda - 19 July 09

skymall — Thu, 11 Mar 2010 12:26:56 GMT

Very informative detail

Comment on Your Sunday morning TV - All Programs Listing - Sunday, December 6

xxx videos — Tue, 02 Feb 2010 12:50:32 GMT

If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.

Comment on UPDATED Your Sunday morning TV - All Programs Listing - 29 November

xxx vids — Tue, 26 Jan 2010 18:16:47 GMT

There is much pleasure to be gained from useless knowledge.

Comment on Your Sunday Morning TV - All Programs Listing - Sunday 22 November

xxx vids — Tue, 19 Jan 2010 11:00:49 GMT

We are here on Earth to do good to others. What the others are here for, I don't know.

Comment on Sunday Morning TV - All Programs Listing - Sunday 11 October

software development — Fri, 27 Nov 2009 15:17:33 GMT

Quite inspiring,
Anyway, thanks for the post

Comment on Sky News - Sunday Agenda - 19 July 09

Maria Hawthorne — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 06:05:44 GMT

This new viewing option is very difficult to use and offputting.
The earlier version was very user-friendly.

Comment on ABC1 - Insiders - 8 Feb 09

Kyle XX — Sat, 07 Feb 2009 04:42:19 GMT

I am in support of the infrastructure spending if the money is fully accountable and the States' can't squander it as they have done with the GST money to date. The proposed school spending is desperately needed regardless of the current economic climate and it is a shame it has taken such a crisis to get some funds to our schools. I just hope the Federal funds don't absolve the State Governments' of their fundamental responsibility to provide decent facilities for our schools. I hope the States' don't see the federal money as a way they can then siphon some of their school maintenance budgets into other projects. As for the cash payments, if I understand things right, to save the economy (and jobs), we need to get people spending and keep them spending. If that is so - $950 to deserving folks should stimulate the economy for all of ........ ooooh - a week! If that. For those not responsible enough to reduce their household debt, that money will go in one sitting. Would it not be far more sensible to get people spending, maybe in smaller amounts, over a sustained period - something you would possibly gain by bringing forward the tax cuts?? Not that I want to agree with Turnbull!

Comment on Network TEN - Meet the Press - 8 Feb 09

Kyle XX — Sat, 07 Feb 2009 04:36:28 GMT

To get people spending and keep them spending, I agree with Turnbull's call to bring forward tax cuts rather than a one-off handout that will be spent (either on debt or just spent) in seconds. But why reject the infrastructure spending. Regardless of the economic climate, it is infrastructure that is desperately needed. If this spending will force the States' to live up to their responsibilities - and highlight their previous failures, I think it should be passed - as long as it is accountable and there is no way the States' can squander it as they have done with our GST money.

Comment on Channel 9 - Today on Sunday - Laurie Oakes Political Interview - 8 Feb 09

Kyle XX — Sat, 07 Feb 2009 04:30:42 GMT

Not that I wouldn't like $950 - if I understand things right, to save the economy (and jobs), we need to get people spending and keep them spending. If that is so - $950 to deserving folks should stimulate the economy for all of ........ ooooh - a week! If that. For those not responsible enough to reduce their household debt, that money will go in one sitting. Would it not be far more sensible to get people spending, maybe in smaller amounts, over a sustained period - something you would possibly gain by bringing forward the tax cuts?? Not that I want to agree with Turnbull! But I do support the infrastructure spending as long as it doesn't absolve the State's of their responsibilities in these vital areas.